Category Archives: Biofuel Funding

Senators propose biofuel shake up with end to ethanol subsidies

US Senators

End of US ethanol subsidies?

The US, and by extension global, biofuel market could be on the verge of a major shake up, after a bi-partisan group of senators yesterday tabled a new bill that would end the generous subsidies provided to US ethanol producers and axe the tariff imposed on ethanol imports.

The group, led by Democrat senator Dianne Feinstein and Oklahoma Republican Tom Coburn, argued that the 45c per gallon tax credit provided to oil refiners for each gallon of ethanol they blend with gasoline was no longer justified given the scale of the US deficit.

The tax break is expected to expire this year, but the senators argue that repealing the necessary legislation before 1 July would save the US government about $3bn.

The new bill would also repeal the 54c per gallon tariff imposed on ethanol imports – a move that could open up the fast-expanding US biofuel market to imports from Colombia and Brazil. Supporters of the bill claim that the tariff makes the US more reliant on fossil fuel imports as it stops imports of cheaper ethanol.

Google Ventures Leads Financing of Biofuels Start-Up

Google Ventures Leads Financing of Biofuels Start-Up

Google Ventures has led a $20 million financing round in CoolPlanetBiofuels, a Southern California start-up that is developing mobile refineries to turn wood chips, agriculture waste and other biomass into biofuels.

CoolPlanetBiofuels, an 18-month-old company, has also attracted the attention of ConocoPhillips, GE Capital and NRG Energy, which participated in the financing round along with North Bridge Venture Partners.

CoolPlanetBiofuels declined to disclose the total capital that it had raised, but it noted that Google Ventures was a major participant in the series B round announced Thursday.

“We take biomass such as corncobs, yard clippings wood chips and fractionate that biomass into discrete gas streams,” said Mike Cheiky, CoolPlanetBiofuels’ chief executive and a longtime technology executive. “Those individual gas streams aren’t really useful by themselves, so we run them through catalytic conversion columns that convert them to useful fuels.”

One limitation of using biomass as a feedstock for biofuels has been the expense of trucking low-value waste long distances to a refinery. So CoolPlanetBiofuels plans to take the refineries to the fuel source by packaging its machines in tractor-trailers.

“Biomass cannot be transported very far because in raw form it has a very low energy content,” Mr. Cheiky said.

He said a typical refinery would consist of a cluster of tractor-trailers that can process 10 million gallons of fuel a year.

“There’s a very large market opportunity here with a lot of headroom for innovation,” said Bill Maris, Google Ventures’ managing director. “These are early days and this space won’t end up with a single winner but any progress Mike and CoolPlanet can make will have a profoundly positive impact on consumers, the industry and the world.”

So far CoolPlanetBiofuels has built a small pilot plant that is producing biofuel for evaluation by oil companies, Mr. Cheiky said. He declined to identify the companies, citing a confidentiality agreement. The company expects to have its first one-million gallon mobile refinery operating within a year.

Mr. Cheiky said CoolPlanetBiofuels would initially make a 105-octane gasoline additive to help refiners meet California’s low-carbon fuel standard.

“We can produce an additive to reduce the carbon footprint and increase the octane of conventional gasoline,” he said.

Next up will be a biofuel that can run in conventional gasoline engines. Eventually, CoolPlanetBiofuels intends to produce a soil additive as a byproduct of the refinery process.

“We can sequester carbon as we make the fuel and make a soil enhancer for crops,” Mr. Cheiky said. “We will have a negative-carbon fuel.”

USDA announces $573 million in bioenergy funding opportunities

In Washington, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack today announced that USDA is seeking applications for loan guarantees under the Biorefinery Assistance Program, and payments to producers under the Repowering Assistance Program, and the Bioenergy Program for Advanced Biofuels.

This funding round includes: $463 million in loan guarantees under the USDA’s Biorefinery Assistance Program;   $25 million under the Repowering Assistance Program to encourage the use of renewable biomass as a replacement fuel source for fossil fuels used to process heat or power in the operation of eligible biorefineries; and up to $85 million under the Bioenergy Program for Advanced Biofuels, for advanced biofuel production from renewable biomass excluding corn kernel starch.

Biofuel Company Close To $1 Billion Fed Loan

Biofuel Company Close To $1 Billion Fed Loan

Biofuel Company Close To $1 Billion Fed Loan

A cellulosic biofuels project, valued at more than $1 billion and consisting of two refineries in Mississippi and another each in Texas and Georgia, appears to be on its way to reality, thanks to a federal government loan guarantee program.

The developer, KiOR, said it had received a term sheet from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Loan Guarantee Program to help build the refineries, which will produce what the industry calls “drop in fuels” for gasoline and diesel. These are fuels that can be used as direct substitutes without having to change a gasoline or diesel engine. In a FAQ for the project, KiOR said it figured the plants could produce some 250 million gallons of the stuff annually from “wood supplies that are sustainably harvested and also used by each of the state’s pulp and paper industries.”

Those pulp and paper industries have been hit hard in recent years, leading to high unemployment in the region, so the biofuels plants are eagerly anticipated. KiOR envisions 14,000 jobs created during construction, then 4,000 permanent jobs when the plants are up and running. But there’s still work to be done before that comes to past.

“While the term sheet is an important step in the process, we recognize that more work lies ahead to finalize the loan guarantee and there is no assurance it will be issued until the loan is closed,” said Fred Cannon, president and CEO of KiOR.

U.S. gives $650 million loan aid for biofuels from waste

whitehouse

Biodiesel industry primed to flourish

The U.S. government on Thursday gave four biofuel companies loan guarantees of nearly $650 million to help build plants that will make motor fuels from sources like animal fat, orange peels and trash.

The government is supporting the development of new feedstocks for ethanol to ease dependence on corn. Nearly 40 percent of the U.S. corn crop goes to making ethanol, which has spurred concerns from environmentalists and food groups that production of the fuel can raise food prices.

The Agriculture Department gave Coskata Inc loan aid of $250 million to build and operate a 55 million gallon-per-year (gpy) plant to make cellulosic ethanol from woody biomass in Alabama. It was the largest loan guarantee ever for a U.S. biofuels producer, said the Renewable Fuels Association, an industry group.

“Our belief is the industry is here to stay,” said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, of cellulosic ethanol in a press teleconference. “There is still tremendous opportunity here.”

Making commercial amounts of advanced fuels at prices competitive to fuels made from corn and soyoil has proved difficult, prompting several small companies to fold. U.S. environment regulators late last year slashed the amount of the advanced fuel that must be produced this year.

The Energy Department offered Diamond Green Diesel, LLC, a joint venture between Valero Energy Corp and Darling International Inc, a loan guarantee of $241 million.

The aid will support the construction of a 137 million gpy renewable diesel plant in Norco, Louisiana, to make fuel from animal fat, used cooking oil and other waste grease. The company estimates the project will create 700 jobs.

Under loan guarantees, the federal government commits to paying portions of private loans in case the companies default on them.

The USDA also offered Enerkem Corp a loan guarantee of $80 million to build a biorefinery that will produce 10 million gpy of advanced biofuel from municipal trash in Mississippi.

And it awarded INEOS New Planet BioEnergy LLC $75 million in loan aid to make biofuels from citrus waste and other agricultural debris in Vero Beach, Florida.

The recession has also slowed development of new feedstocks that are supposed to begin replacing corn.

An early recipient of federal assistance, Range Fuels, has decided to shut down operations while raising more investment money. Range Fuels received an $80 million USDA loan guarantee in 2009, following a $76 million Energy Department grant in 2008 for a plant in Georgia, and raised $100 million in private capital in 2008.

Jonathan Silver, the chief of the Energy Department’s loan guarantee program, said until now, the DOE had faced challenges in helping producers of new biofuels. In part, that was because financiers there had trouble understanding how sales from such plants work in commodity markets, Silver said at the Clean-tech Investor Summit in Indian Wells, California.

Separately, the government also issued loan aid to solar power. The DOE awarded $967 million in loan aid to an NRG Energy subsidy to help pay for the world’s biggest solar plant using photovoltaic panels at the Agua Caliente plant in Arizona.

A golden handshake for China’s biofuel industry

chinese_flag

Friendly policies for overseas investors to invest in China's biofuel sector have influenced partnerships between domestic and foreign companies

Friendly policies for overseas investors to invest in China’s biofuel sector have influenced partnerships between domestic and foreign companies to develop the alternative to fossil fuel.

Green Biologics (GBL), a British biotech company, has signed deals with two Chinese biochemical producers – Guangxi Jinyuan Biochemical and Lianyungang Union of Chemicals, the Financial Times reported.

Under the agreements, which are expected to be worth $15 million over the next five years, Green Biologics will provide its fermentation technology to existing production facilities at Guangxi Jinyuan and Lianyungang Union to enable biobutanol production using lower cost sustainable feedstock.

Biobutanol is a substitute for petroleum-based n-butanol, an important chemical used in the production of polymers and plastics and as a solvent in paint.

The worldwide n-butanol market is worth over $4 billion annually with China the fastest-growing market, GBL said in a statement on its website.

“These agreements build on GBL’s successful business-development programs in China where over the last three years our focus has been on introducing advanced technology to allow the profitable operation of existing biobutanol facilities for the chemical market. The relationship with leading Chinese biochemical companies and China-UK Low Carbon Enterprise Co Ltd will allow us to significantly accelerate this process,” said Sean Sutcliffe, GBL chief executive.

In addition, these companies can provide a platform for the introduction of the next generation of GBL technology, which will see the roll-out of biobutanol as a low cost advanced biofuel derived from sustainable feedstocks, he said.

“Because of the government’s support and the potential of the market, more players have joined the biofuel industry recently,” said Michael Fredskov Christiansen, president of Novozymes (China) Investment Co Ltd.

In May, Novozymes announced its cooperation with Sinopec and COFCO on a demonstration facility that will convert agricultural waste into biofuel.

Bioenergy is considered one of the three key alternatives to fossil fuel use, alongside wind and solar energy, because of its easy acquisition and clean emissions. Biorefining is a conversion process that produces fuel, power, heat, and value-added chemicals from biomass, the biological raw material extracted from organic sources.

According to a report on the future of biorefineries by the World Economic Forum (WEF), together with leading companies and consultancies including Novozymes and McKinsey, the conversion of biomass into fuel, energy and chemicals has the potential to generate upwards of $230 billion for the global economy by 2020.

The industry will register up to 32 billion yuan ($4.8 billion) profit for China, and provide six million new jobs, mainly in rural areas. It will also create a 96 billion yuan market for construction projects in the value chain.

The industry will improve China’s energy security, boost GDP growth, and balance development between urban and rural regions, according to the WEF report.

Source and thanks ChinaDaily

Singapore To Hold Biofuels Conference In March 2011

Singapore

Singapore To Hold Biofuels Conference In March

International academia, scientists and experts on biofuels will meet in Singapore in March to identify promising avenues to a viable biofuels future.

The experts will discuss economic and environmental considerations of biofuel technologies and the integration of biofuels into the existing energy infrastructure, while the academia, government and the private sector will discuss and comment on research and policy.

The six-day conference to begin on March 1 is being organised by a United States-based non-profit organisation, Keystone Symposia on Molecular and Cellular Biology, and Singapore’s Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR).

In a statement here Wednesday, A*STAR said the conference titled “Biofuels” will discuss the options of biofuels for an economic and sustainable future, sustainability of cellulosic ethanol (biofuel produced from non-food biomass), algae biofuels (deriving fuel from algae), development of new biomass feedstocks and potential of biomass production in Southeast Asia.

Among the internationally renowned speakers at the conference includes Dr Adam Brown of the International Energy Agency, Professor Timothy Donohue of the University of Wisconsin-Madison/ Great Lakes Bioenergy, Dr Arthur Grossman of Solazyme Inc and Professor Lonnie Ingram of the University of Florida.

One of the conference’s scientific organiser Professor Stephen P. Mayfield of the University of California said one of the greatest challenges that mankind faced today was to develop efficient, sustainable and scalable processes for converting sunlight energy into the food and fuel the world needs.

“No single renewable-energy strategy will be able to provide a total solution but a combination of strategies that can be coordinated and integrated effectively has the potential to significantly decrease our dependence on fossil fuel,” he said.

He added that at this critical time in mapping a new global energy strategy, this symposium would address the potential of cellulosic and algal produced bioenergy as part of a sustainable future for the world.

Keystone Symposia held its first meeting on biofuels last year in US.

More information on the conference can be found at www.keystonesymposia.org/biofuels.

Al Gore admits supporting corn ethanol subsidies was a mistake

Al Gore

Al Gore admits supporting corn ethanol subsidies was a mistake

Former Vice President and presidential candidate Al Gore has changed his stance concerning ethanol. As vice president, Gore created subsidies for corn-based ethanol. The move, it turns out, was aimed more towards garnering votes for his upcoming presidential run than doing what’s best for the environment. At a recent green energy conference in Athens, Greece, Gore said:

It is not a good policy to have these massive subsidies for first-generation ethanol. One of the reasons I made that mistake is that I paid particular attention to the farmers in my home state of Tennessee and I had a certain fondness for the farmers in the state of Iowa because I was about to run for president.

The process to turn corn to ethanol – i.e., first-generation ethanol – is pretty inefficient, using tons of water with only modest energy returns. In 2008, the bio-fuel industry got flak for larger and larger quantities of the corn crops being used to create ethanol resulting in a rise in food prices. Even with his admission that he was more about the votes than the science in the ethanol debate, he has not completely abandoned the biofuel. He now favors what is called second-generation ethanol, which uses farm waste and switchgrass instead of corn to produce the fuel.

Responding to Gore’s change of heart, Growth Energy CEO Tom Buis repeated an invitation for Gore to visit a modern ethanol plant:

Mr. Vice President, what you may not realize is that ethanol is the commercially viable alternative to oil that we have today. Every day, America’s ethanol producers are developing technological improvements to increase efficiency, reduce water use, and boost the amount of energy derived from grain and from cellulosic biomass. Ethanol is more energy efficient to produce than conventional gasoline; for every one Btu put into creating ethanol, there is a 2.3 Btu return. Mr. Vice President, my original offer still stands. I invite you to visit any one of the 67 ethanol plants across the country that are members of Growth Energy, to see for yourself what grain ethanol has done – and what it has the potential to do – for our country.

For exactly the same reasons Gore supported ethanol while in office, federal ethanol subsidies are probably not disappearing anytime soon. The $7.7 billion in subsidies last year are a small price to pay to keep the farmers’ and bio-fuel industry’s votes.

via Al Gore admits supporting corn ethanol subsidies was a mistake — Autoblog Green.

Friends of the earth: “Buying Bills: How the Biofuels Industry Influences Congress to Waste Your Taxpayer Dollars”

whitehouse

US biofuel lobby

A new report released last week by Friends of the Earth called “Buying Bills: How the Biofuels Industry Influences Congress to Waste Your Taxpayer Dollars”  details the myriad ways in which the biofuels industry, led by corn ethanol producers have skirted environmental legislation in pursuit of nearly $9.5 billion in annual subsidies to farmers and corn producers.

“There is nothing clean or green about dirty biofuels like ethanol, which has only survived in the market because of three decades of subsidies and mandates,” said Friends of the Earth biofuels campaign coordinator Kate McMahon. “This report paints a picture where certain legislators, at the behest of industry, are pushing flawed legislation through the halls of Congress against the public’s interest.”

Over the course of the past several years, the biofuels lobby, lead by groups such as The Renewable Fuels Association, The National Biodiesel Board, Growth Energy and POET PAC, have funneled millions to congressmen and their staff. “The top recipients of contributions in each chamber, Sen. John Thune (R-SD) and Rep. Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin (R-SD), each received approximately $30,000 from the industry in the past three years according to public records,” the study said.

Just in time for last week’s historic election, the EPA announced plans to increase the blend of ethanol in gasoline from 10 percent to 15 percent. However, ethanol’s big win was more than a fluke, nor should it be seen as a good sign for the alternative energy sector as a whole.

The major recipients of any tax breaks or subsidies for biofuels are not leading edge technology companies, but farming states, where corn is turned into ethanol. Iowa, for instance, has 26 percent of the all U.S. ethanol refining capacity. The state’s corn growers recently launched a social media campaign where it asked college students to shill for the industry on YouTube in adesperate dance for dollars.

However, all biofuels are not created equal. Technically a biofuel, corn ethanol has done nothing to make us energy independent, but it has been touted as a major source of “renewable energy” at taxpayers’ expense. Producing as much energy from corn ethanol as is contained in a single gallon of gasoline costs American taxpayers $1.76, according to a study by Manhattan Institute senior fellow Robert Bryce. As far as sustainability goes, the ethanol industry will survive so long as the public has a sustained appetite for such distorted math that results in a fuel that isn’t actually that clean.

Federal support for the renewable energy sector is very much on the table when the lame ducks are thrown out, and Congress resumes its work in January. Fortune polled the leaders of several geothermal energy companies on whether they thought that funding for alternative energies will all come under the knife, or whether each will be treated as separate entity. At issue is a showdown between climate denial and the need to forge energy independence.

Another study released today shows that biodiesel from algae is at least 10 years from commercial viability, according to research from the Energy Biosciences Institute, which was created from a $500 million grant given to UC Berkeley from oil giant BP in 2007. This will only add fuel to the flames of climate deniers and renewable energy skeptics, while emboldening ethanol advocates who can point to an existing, domestic source of alternative energy.

While ethanol does not advance America’s ambition to be energy independent, don’t expect the special treatment to end any time soon.

Source alttransport.com

Global Biofuels Alliance officially launched

south_africa-Biofuel

Global Biofuel Alliance formed

The Global Biofuels Alliance has officially launched. The nonprofit organization will work to “give a voice to the producers, traders, feedstock providers, and equipment manufacturers of the emerging biofuel industry.” Made up of ten founding members from various energy sectors including energy trading companies, start-up biodiesel companies and large biodiesel production facilities, the alliance has already set its sights on the hottest topic in the biodiesel industry. “The biodiesel tax credit is a key agenda,” said Wade Randlett, a founding board member of the alliance and cofounder of Enagra Holdings LLC, a holding company for renewable energy projects worldwide. “Although it’s a bit broader than that. I think having some form of longer term incentive for any kind of a renewable diesel, regardless of the feedstock, the source or the technology is important.”

For Randlett and the other members of the alliance, including Hero BX, a 45 MMgy plant from Pennsylvania, the understanding by those in Washington on the subject of biodiesel is very narrow; especially the potential role biodiesel could play in the nation’s future fuel supply. “We think there should be a much broader conversation about the new technologies that are coming online or are online right now,” Randlett said. “Whether it’s a traditional feedstock or a broader biomass-based feedstock, we need to have the conversation about the opportunity to displace imported crude petroleum oil.”